I'm happy to report that I needn't had worried as it was a joy from start to finish - and not too long to boot. Part of the reason for wanting to go was because I was keen to see how staging issues were resolved and what kind of narrative would be used to tell the story. This is because I am planning to write and perform my own one-woman show in collaboration with someone who shall be known as Grayson Bart. Unlike the already fictional Pickwick Papers as an inspiration, we are basing the show on an actual real-life person, called Charlotte Charke, daughter of Colley Cibber, a (then) famous (even infamous) actor-manager, playwright and Poet Laureate, who was active in 18th Century London. She was an extremely unconventional person and had a very unusual life for a woman of this period - or quite frankly - any period! At this stage we are still very much immersed in research, which whilst fascinating, is also like wading through treacle. There's so much material there: she was a actress in a turbulent period for the theatre and excelled in 'breeches roles' (where a female character dresses as a man); she had a troubled relationship with her father (and indeed with all men, since she was not content to play the traditional 'demure' female role either on stage or off it); she often played her father's love-interest opposite him on stage; as a young women she set herself up as a quack, peddling potions made from snails to her 'patients'; later she sold sausages for a time and incidentally, for a significant part of her life dressed as a man and called herself Mr Brown and even incited a few marriage proposals from love-stuck gentlewomen. Where to start to dramatise all that drama?! I must admit it's quite daunting... you kind of need a 'hook' to hang it on, and if that means inventing one and being a little liberal with the 'truth' so be it.
It may be that we give it a Shakespearian twist, pop her in a time-machine or give her some kind of masked superhero(ine) identity - at this stage we just don't know and quite frankly anything is up for grabs. This Monday, Grayson and I will attempt to come up with an initial structure (or several possible structures) to give the continued research a bit more of a focus**. Last week we watched the Ian McKellen version of King Lear with this purpose in mind. Brilliantly acted, beautifully staged, but still tough (at least for us) at three hours long. This was a vast improvement on the Brian Blessed version however which induced some fairly insane rocking and quite possibly dribbling in us, its viewers. Brian Blessed just never stopped being Brian Blessed and we both found it impossible to follow. This is the thing with Shakespeare, in my opinion: done badly, it's impenetrable indistinguishable mush where 'act-oars' feel the need to put on their best 'Shakespearian voice'; on the other hand, performed and directed well, where the actor actually knows what s/he is saying, it's beautiful. Apparently Cibber adapted some Shakespeare plays (according to one source, his Romeo and Juliet is vastly superior to the Bard's!) so this is a possibility.
It was extremely useful for me to watch Nevison's Pickwick to see how he used the space and props to become different characters on stage. At just over an hour long, it was the right length too. Having been in Dickie's productions, which with all the 'dicking about' he did with them could run for 3 - sometimes 4 hours(!) I know how tedious and disrespectful this can feel for an audience. Lesson learnt: don't make it necessary for anyone to have to bite their own arm off (or perhaps more likely, leave) if they're going to watch your show!
* http://www.whatsonstage.com/index.php
http://www.dickens2012.org/event/trials-and-tribulations-mrpickwick
**This must be done by December 20th or it'll mean more punishments of the marzipan-variety for me, as it's on the 'priority task-list' to be achieved for this month!
Charlotte Charke, impersonating her father Colley Cibber at the age of four.